Forensic Analysis for Signature-Based Detection to Secure Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24203/s3z7rf34Keywords:
signature-based Detection, Forensic analysis, Cybersecurity, Malware DetectionAbstract
Signature-based detection remains one of the cornerstone methods in cybersecurity for identifying known threats. However, its effectiveness is challenged by the rapid evolution of malware, including zero-day attacks and polymorphic viruses. This study explores the role of forensic analysis in enhancing the capabilities of signature-based detection. By examining real-world case studies and employing modern forensic techniques, it demonstrate how forensic analysis can detect patterns and anomalies that go beyond traditional signature matching. It analyzes the limitations of signature-based systems, the evasion techniques used by attackers, and the potential of integrating artificial intelligence to bolster forensic methods. The findings underscore the need for continuous advancements in detection techniques, focusing forensic analysis as a crucial tool in modern cybersecurity defense strategies.
References
[1] Singh, R., & Singh, H. (2022). Enhancing Malware Detection Systems Using Hybrid Techniques: A Forensic Perspective. Journal of Cyber Security Technology, 6(2), 120-135.
[2] Wang, L., & Li, X. (2021). Limitations of Signature-Based Detection Systems and the Role of Forensic Analysis in Mitigating Advanced Threats. Digital Forensics Journal, 9(4), 87-101.
[3] Sharma, A., & Gupta, K. (2022). AI-Augmented Forensic Analysis in Improving Cybersecurity Resilience. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 17, 987-998.
[4] Soni, A., & Aljarrah, A. (2021). Enhancing Malware Detection Using Hybrid Approaches. Journal of Cybersecurity Technology.
[5] Kim, J., & Smith, M. (2022). Investigating the Role of Forensics in Modern Threat Detection. International Journal of Digital Forensics.
[6] Patel, R., & Nakamura, K. (2022). Combining Forensic and Signature-Based Methods for Advanced Persistent Threats. Cybersecurity Frontiers.
[7] Peterson, G., & Shenoi, S. (2023). Advances in Digital Forensics. XIX, IFIP WG 11.9 International Conference.
[8] BlueVoyant (2023). Understanding Digital Forensics: Process, Techniques, and Tools.
[9] Ziaie Tabari, A., Liu, G., & Ou, X. (2023). Revealing Human Attacker Behaviors Using IoT Honeypots. ICDF Proceedings.
[10] Nicholson, T., & Hayes, D. (2023). Forensic Analysis of Apple Pay. ICDF Proceedings.
[11] Qin, S., & Lang, Y. (2023). Anomaly Detection in Water Treatment Systems. ICDF Proceedings.
[12] Zargar, S., Joshi, K., & Aishwarya, R. (2022). A Comprehensive Survey on the Role of Machine Learning In Cybersecurity. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy. Link to source.
[13] Ahmed, M., Mahmood, A. N., & Hu, J. (2022). A Survey of Network Anomaly Detection Techniques. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 198, 103335.
[14] Chen, T., & Chao, H. (2023). Behavioral Malware Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques. Computers & Security, 114, 103688.
[15] Abt, S., Behrendt, C., & Müller, H. (2023). Cyber Threat Intelligence: A Review. Computers & Security, 113, 103616.
[16] Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, S. (2023). Data Privacy in Digital Forensics: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 18(1), 1-14.
[17] McCormack, A., Birk, J., & Williams, P. (2022). Ethical Guidelines for Digital Forensics: Balancing Security and Privacy. International Journal of Information Security, 21(4), 493-507.
[18] Wiggins, T., & Marroquin, C. (2024). Accountability in Digital Forensics: Establishing Governance Frameworks. Forensic Science International, 337, 111402.
[19] Martinez, R., Lee, J., & Park, H. (2022). The Role of Law Enforcement in Digital Forensic Investigations. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 3(3), 509-525. Link to source.
[20] Gupta, A., & Sharma, P. (2023). Malware Detection Issues, Future Trends, and Challenges: A Survey. IEEE Access, 11, 14321-14338. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3245667
[21] Ahmed, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Limitations of Signature-Based Detection Systems and Advanced Evasion Techniques. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 3(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp3020018
[22] Patel, R., & Zhou, L. (2022). Challenges and Future Directions for Signature-Based Malware Detection. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8482. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178482
[23] Vinugayathri, Cybersecurity News (2023), Why Signature-Based Detection Struggles To Keep Up With The New Attack Landscape?. https:// cybersecuritynews.com/signature-based-detection/
[24] Peterson & Shenoi (2023), Advances in Digital Forensics XIX, 19th IFIP WG 11.9 International Conference, ICDF 2023, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2023, Springer.
[25] Aryal, K., Gupta, M., Abdelsalam, M., & Saleh, M. (2024). Intra-Section Code Cave Injection for Adversarial Evasion Attacks On Windows PE Malware File. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06428.
[26] Bostani, H., & Moonsamy, V. (2021). Evadedroid: A Practical Evasion Attack on Machine Learning For Black-Box Android Malware Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03301.
[27] Atefi, S., Panda, S., Panaousis, E., & Laszka, A. (2022). Principled Data-Driven Decision Support for Cyber-Forensic Investigations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13345.
[28] Macak, M., Stovcik, M., Rebok, T., Ge, M., Rossi, B., & Buhnova, B. (2022). Copas: A Big Data Forensic Analytics System. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04843.
[29] Grispos, G., Tursi, F., Choo, K. K. R., & Glisson, W. B. (2021). A Digital Forensics Investigation of A Smart Scale Iot Ecosystem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.05518.
[30] Taylor, A. (2023). A Digital Forensics Case Study of the DJI Mini 3 Pro And DJI RC. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10487.
[31] Roder, A., Choo, K. K. R., & Le-Khac, N.-A. (2018). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Forensic Investigation Process: DJI Phantom 3 Drone as A Case Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08649.
[32] Solanke, S., & Biasiotti, M. A. (2022). Digital Forensics AI: Evaluating, Standardizing and Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Digital Forensic Investigations. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 36(2), 173–182.
[33] Lockett, A. (2021). Assessing the Effectiveness of YARA Rules for Signature-Based Malware Detection and Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13910.
[34] Agarwal, N., & Hussain, S. Z. (2018). Identification of Flaws in the Design of Signatures for Intrusion Detection Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10848.
[35] Lockett, A. (2021). Assessing the Effectiveness of YARA Rules for Signature-Based Malware Detection and Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13910.
[36] Alharbi, S., & Khan, A. (2024). Ensemble Defense System: A Hybrid IDS Approach for Effective Cyber Threat Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03491.
[37] Atefi, S., Panda, S., Panaousis, E., & Laszka, A. (2022). Principled Data-Driven Decision Support for Cyber-Forensic Investigations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13345.
[38] Macak, M., Stovcik, M., Rebok, T., Ge, M., Rossi, B., & Buhnova, B. (2022). Copas: A Big Data Forensic Analytics System. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04843.
[39] Patel, R., & Zhou, L. (2022). Malware Detection Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions: A Survey. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8482.
[40] Fakiha, B. S. (2023). Enhancing Cyber Forensics with AI And Machine Learning: A Study On Automated Threat Analysis And Classification. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 13(4), 701–707.
[41] Yang, L., Moubayed, A., Shami, A., Boukhtouta, A., Heidari, P., Preda, S., Brunner, R., Migault, D., & Larabi, A. (2023). Forensic Data Analytics for Anomaly Detection In Evolving Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09171.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abbas Khudhair Abbas Al-Juboori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The articles published in International Journal of Computer and Information Technology (IJCIT) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
