Technique of Semantic Unambiguity for a Concept Selection of Terms in Focused Contexts with Reinforcement Learning Integration

Authors

  • Churee Teechawut Computer Science Department, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  • Khananat Jaroenchai Computer Science Department, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24203/ijcit.v10i6.147

Keywords:

Semantic Unambiguity, Concept Selection, Natural Language Processing, Reinforcement Learning, Knowledge Engineering

Abstract

Nowadays, there have been many developments of learning processes for computers to understand the meaning of words and their semantic similarities in order for the computers to better communicate, interact and exchange information with humans. Semantic learning development is a major issue because computers cannot comprehend the suitable meaning of words in the concerning concept. As a result, this research is proposing and exploring the efficiency of the technique of semantic unambiguity in order to clarify the Term Concepts in the focused contexts. From the case study with 22 contexts, 62 term, and 475 synsets, it was shown that Reinforcement Learning could accurately select the suitable term concepts for the focused contexts, with Precision = 0.7756, Recall = 0.7756 and F-Measure = 0.7735. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Technique of Semantic Unambiguity for a Concept Selection of Terms in Focused Contexts has high accuracy when applying the Reinforcement Learning.

References

E. Kotzé, B.A. Senekal, and W. Daelemans, Automatic classification of social media reports on violent incidents in South Africa using machine learning. South African Journal of Science, 116(3-4), 1-8, 2020

K. Erk and S. Padó, A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 897-906), 2008.

P. Hajek, A. Barushka, and M. Munk, Fake consumer review detection using deep neural networks integrating word embeddings and emotion mining. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(23), 17259-17274, 2020

S. M. Mohammad and P. D. Turney, Crowdsourcing a word–emotion association lexicon. Computational intelligence, 29(3), 436-465, 2013.

K. Jaroenchai and C. Techawut, "Know-Ont Based Ontology Modeling Approach for Skill Knowledge Extraction," International Journal of Knowledge Engineering vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 81-86, 2018.

A. De Nicola, M. Missikoff and R. Navigli, A software engineering approach to ontology building. Information systems, 34(2), 258-275, 2009.

G. A. Miller, WordNet: An electronic lexical database. MIT press, 1998.

C. Corley and R. Mihalcea, Measuring the semantic similarity of texts. In Proceedings of the ACL workshop on empirical modeling of semantic equivalence and entailment (pp. 13-18). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005.

A. Hamouda, M. Marei and M. Rohaim, Building machine learning based senti-word lexicon for sentiment analysis. Journal of advances in information technology, 2(4), 199-203, 2011.

L. P. Kaelbling, M. L. Littman and A. W. Moore, Reinforcement learning: A survey. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 4, 237-285, 1996.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Teechawut, C., & Jaroenchai, K. (2021). Technique of Semantic Unambiguity for a Concept Selection of Terms in Focused Contexts with Reinforcement Learning Integration . International Journal of Computer and Information Technology(2279-0764), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.24203/ijcit.v10i6.147